TL;DR
Get business pricing on tools and workshop supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
Pro Tool Reviews tested Milwaukee’s M18 Fuel 2834 and Makita’s 40V max XGT GSH01 cordless circular saws. Milwaukee cut faster in two timed, demanding OSB rip tests, while both saws performed well in crosscuts, miter cuts, bevel cuts and compound cuts. The results reflect the publication’s tests, not a universal ranking for every job or user.
Pro Tool Reviews has compared Milwaukee’s M18 Fuel 2834 and Makita’s 40V max XGT GSH01 cordless circular saws, reporting that Milwaukee was faster in two timed rip-cut tests while the saws performed similarly on several other cuts. The results give buyers of premium 7 1/4-inch cordless saws a practical comparison, but do not establish that one model is best for every user or application.
In a test of double-stacked 3/4-inch OSB, the publication pulled each saw along a custom sled using a 10-pound weight and timed a 7-foot rip. Milwaukee’s 2834 completed the cut in 9.76 seconds, compared with 13.53 seconds for Makita’s GSH01. In a second test through triple-stacked 3/4-inch OSB at full depth, Milwaukee finished in 17.41 seconds and Makita in 24.74 seconds.
The report says Makita’s saw maintained its blade speed well under demanding cuts, but Milwaukee was faster in the side-by-side rip tests. The publication describes Milwaukee’s advantage as a win in that category, rather than saying the Makita lacked power. Its account does not provide a broader statistical sample or claim that the timed results predict performance in every material or work setting.
For standard crosscuts, miter cuts and bevel cuts, Pro Tool Reviews found the models closely matched. Both also completed the reported compound-cut tests without issue. The saws share a 7 1/4-inch blade, a stated no-load speed of 6,000 RPM and a maximum 90-degree cutting depth of 2 5/8 inches, according to the supplied product specifications.
Rip Speed Sets the Main Difference
The test points to a distinction that may matter most to buyers who regularly make long or demanding rip cuts: Milwaukee recorded the faster times in both of the publication’s OSB trials. For routine crosscuts and angled cuts, however, the review found little performance separation, so the rip results alone do not settle which saw is the better fit for every job.
Platform compatibility and work features may shape the choice alongside cutting speed. Milwaukee’s 2834 is part of the M18 Fuel system and includes a folding rafter hook, electronic blade brake, LED work light and dust blower. Makita’s GSH01 runs on the 40V max XGT platform and offers AWS compatibility with a compatible transmitter, a tether point and three positive-stop bevel positions. Buyers invested in either battery system may weigh those details heavily.
The comparison is useful because it puts two premium cordless saws through the same described tests, but it is not a complete ownership-cost or durability study. The supplied report gives no price comparison, long-term service results or battery-runtime findings. Those factors could change a purchase decision even when the cutting tests favor one model.
Popular right now
Shark Navigator Lift-Away Upright Vacuum (NV360)
Dreame L40 Ultra Gen 2 Robot Vacuum and Mop
KitchenAid Artisan Series 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Dried Rose (KSM150PS)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Two Similar 7 1/4-Inch Flagships
The review frames both products as competitors in the premium cordless circular saw market. Milwaukee’s 2834 is described as the latest generation of its M18 Fuel sidewinder-style 7 1/4-inch saw. Its listed maximum bevel angle is 57 degrees; the report says that is higher than the previous-generation 2732. The 2834 can cut to 2 1/16 inches at 45 degrees, according to the supplied specifications.
Makita’s GSH01 draws on its 40V max XGT platform. Its maximum bevel angle is listed as 56 degrees, with positive stops at 22.5, 45 and 56 degrees. Its listed cutting depth at 45 degrees is 1 13/16 inches. The report also notes that, unlike the Milwaukee model, the Makita has no rafter hook. These specifications describe differences in design and capacity; the test account does not say that they produced a decisive advantage in ordinary cuts.
Pro Tool Reviews says its test set included 2x materials and OSB subflooring, covering rip, cross, miter, bevel and compound cuts. The outlet says this approach was intended to reduce some variables between tests. Its published comparison is the source for the reported timings and observations in this article.
“Milwaukee pulled ahead in raw cutting speed.”
— Pro Tool Reviews
Limits of the Published Comparison
The supplied source does not give a publication date, product prices, battery configurations used during testing, runtime measurements or long-term reliability results. It also does not report how many repeats were run for each timed test or provide a margin of measurement error. The times should therefore be read as results from this review’s stated setup, not as a guarantee of the same difference in other conditions.
The report excerpt says both saws handled compound cuts well, but it ends before detailing every result or giving a complete overall scoring method. It is unclear from the supplied material whether the review considered factors such as weight, balance, noise, dust collection or total system cost in a final overall verdict. No independent test data are included here to confirm or challenge the outlet’s findings.
Match the Saw to Your Work
For a buyer choosing between these models, the next step is to compare the full review and current product details with the work planned: repeated heavy rip cuts, angled cuts, battery-platform compatibility and preferred safety or convenience features. The reported results favor Milwaukee for speed in the two timed OSB rip tests, while the outlet found the saws closely matched in several other cut types.
Readers should check current manufacturer specifications, local availability and pricing before buying, since those details are not established by the supplied source. The material provided does not announce a follow-up test, price update or further development, so any broader comparison remains open to additional evidence.
Key Questions
Which saw was faster in the reported rip-cut tests?
Milwaukee’s 2834 was faster in both tests described by Pro Tool Reviews: 9.76 seconds versus 13.53 seconds in a 7-foot double-stacked OSB rip, and 17.41 seconds versus 24.74 seconds through triple-stacked OSB at full depth.
Did the review find one saw better at every type of cut?
No. The report found the models closely matched on crosscuts, miter cuts and bevel cuts, and said both handled the compound-cut tests without issue. Milwaukee’s reported lead was in the two demanding rip-cut tests.
What are the main listed specification differences?
Both have a 7 1/4-inch blade, a stated 6,000 RPM no-load speed and a 2 5/8-inch cutting depth at 90 degrees. Milwaukee lists a 57-degree bevel capacity and a 2 1/16-inch depth at 45 degrees; Makita lists a 56-degree capacity, stops at 22.5, 45 and 56 degrees, and a 1 13/16-inch depth at 45 degrees.
Does the test prove Milwaukee is the better buy?
No. It reports faster Milwaukee results in two specific rip-cut tests, but the supplied material does not compare price, battery runtime, durability or long-term ownership costs. The best choice may depend on a buyer’s work and existing battery platform.
Source: rss
